Religion is the art of the impossible (Peter Calvay)

My God, I read the following quote:

Politics is only the art of the possible, religion is the art of the impossible. Only religion or a relationship with God will change the hearts of the people from within. *

Would You like to comment on this?

It will be My pleasure.

28 years ago, I have put this book on your path and you over read this truth, and now the time has come to go into it. You are understanding the quote now. Would you therefore first like to comment on it?

Oh yes.

Politics is still more often concerned about what here and now can be achieved, socially, even though there are great ideals. But they are more difficult to grasp in terms of realization. And religion is actually an ideal difficult to achieve as well, but by Your presence within it's as if this ideal is always calling, always confronting, can be close always, and very personal, because of the call of my conscience, Your voice so to speak.
So my experience says: politics is promising it and religion is making it possible.
In the here and now You are beckoning: a gesture from us, a kind word, the realization that we are all children of God, that brings it so intensely close, again and again. So tangible, Your call. So close, Your presence. So helpful, Your strength. So simple, Your energy. Something like that?

Something like that, my son, you're closer than thirty years ago. And the most important part  I will mention you yet.

Politicians are only human, and live their ideals not all the time.
And God is within you the incarnate Christ, the imitable Mohamed, the life of Buddha, the beauty of Krishna.
God is WITHIN you and always available, always traceable, always subservient, always loving.
So your guide is not a political leader, a human being, someone on TV.
Your guide is a great presence, who will guide you, who will designate you a direction, who will touch you in the heart, not for a while, but day and night. God is your changer, and a highly reliable presence, IN YOU.

My blessings to you all

 
*See Peter Calvay Prophet, Rayner Torkington

Nr. 351

Why predictions not always appear to be true (Fate, 3)

My God, and now I am quite curious about the punch line of these three blogs. Why have I experienced recently that a prediction of You did not appear to be true? Just to come straight out with it. Even though I have to admit that many other predictions from Thee appeared to be true, and I always thank you very much for this, but now it has gone wrong, I do need an explanation. Did I not listen, was I struggling with my ego too much, are these predictions more difficult to listen to objectively when I am personally involved or is there another reason? Would You like to comment on this?

My son, there is indeed another reason. But let's make it really personal. That helps your fellow men when they are reading this. For who has not experienced this, that something not happened when it seemed to happen so terribly. And it actually doesn’t matter for this story if what would happen was based on reasonableness, on wisdom, on logic, on a probability or on a prediction of a very reputable psychic. In all cases something very different from what was expected happened. In your example, it is all about a prediction and not just from anybody but from your Spark of God. Can you get it higher and better? Yet something else happened.

Didn’t you listen to Me well? Was there some static on the line? Did you colour it with your hidden desires and needs? I tell you, none of this. But first you may start with the quote to which I've led you.

In your realm of reality, there is no real freedom but the freedom of ideas, and there is no real bondage except for the bondage of ideas (intently), for your ideas form your private and mass reality. ………All of the time, the psychological reality is the primary one, that forms all of your events. *

My son, you have chosen in your contact with Me a reality waiting for you very clearly, very likely, very tangibly and very concretely. And I tell you, provided you were making a particular choice. And by circumstances another choice has been made which is unfolding for you another reality. And this other choice was more determined by others than you preferred to. Wasn’t I capable of foreseeing this? Isn’t God omniscient and omnipotent? God is, indeed, My son, and all Sparks of God are the same, inseparable and undivided connected to the ONE God. And I sketched you from your perspective, from your will,  from your fascination with the scenario that would surely ensue. And I knew of other possible scenarios, but you could not take these scenarios, they were too far away, or not realistic, from the perspective of your will.

And man is not on his one.
The will of someone else forced itself in your situation, so prevalent and so compelling that you became powerless. And so it happened that by a single volition of someone else, and by your powerlessness, which is in fact a decision, suddenly a different scenario came nearby. And I could have showed you in your mind, but you could and did not want to hear this, so you did not hear it.

In short, the future of man and the future of mankind have many probabilities, and not always the most likely is unfolding. Therefore, in the eyes of God even more than in the eyes of mankind this is true, "where there's a will, there's a way”. Even when it concerns the will of someone else.

My blessings to you all
 
* Jane Roberts, The individual and the nature of mass events, p. 234/235

Nr. 350

Man determines his path, not God (Fate, 2)

I read this sentence in a book by Jane Roberts * " The future is in no way predetermined on basic levels. This does not mean that the future cannot be predicted sometimes, for in practical terms you will often continue with certain lines of probability which can be seen ‘ahead of time’."  It seems very contradictory with God knowing everything and having the destiny of man in Its hands. Would You like to comment on this?

My son, because of a recent experience in life you're really fascinated by this, is it not? I really love to comment on this. It concerns an issue, very important for mankind, namely the destiny of man and the will of God. And the question why one person is experiencing the most terrible things, and the other person is being in luck throughout life.

Since the allegorical fall of Lucifer, former King of angels and supreme ruler in the heavenly spheres, and since then in the eyes of man, Satan and ruler of darkness, this topic is relevant. Why since then? Because God then decided that the image of God on earth, man, should get free will and could bring about his own destiny, with all its consequences. Man may bring his own destiny, may follow his own free will and will make his own choices, become ruler in his own universe, follow his own path. And so it happened. Lucifer is still indignant that such a former ape was given by God more potential and future possibilities than what would ever be possible for other ranges of creatures, the angels. And so it is, still.

Man is at a fundamental level, the maker of his own destiny, master of his own universe. And this truth is much to the annoyance of many ministers of religion, is not understood by many loving men having an eye for earthly suffering.

Oh earthly suffering, so often misunderstood and wrongly interpreted.

Earthly suffering caused by the accidents of terrestrial evolution, by the conscious choices for the ego by human beings, for the lusts, for ephemeral happiness at the expense of others. Earthly suffering, so often caused by ill will, earthly misfortune and supported with a heavenly patience.

Earthly suffering, as often the result of the Earth's evolution and also regularly a situation of being on the wrong place and living in the wrong time, is not necessarily willed by God, but still happening in the gardens of God. Earthly suffering as often not intended by God’s will, but always subject to God’s laws, making this one thing always done: how horrible this suffering will be in magnitude and intensity, in its effects on man, it will always be subject to the one beautiful law of God: "the consequences of evil in the good sense are a thousand times bigger than the evil itself."

My blessings to you all

 
*Jane Roberts, The nature of personal reality, page 282

No. 349

How can the existence of your exquisite consciousness possibly be the result of a conglomeration of chemicals and elements? (Fate, 1)

My God, I found in a book* the next quote.

 “To me, it is almost inconceivable that, from your position, any of you seriously consider that the existence of your exquisite consciousness can possibly be the result of a conglomeration of chemicals
and elements thrown together by a universe accidentally formed, and soon to vanish. So much more evidence is available to you: the order of nature; the creative drama of your dreams, that project your consciousness into other times and places; the very precision with which you spontaneously grow, without knowing how, from a fetus into an adult; the existence of heroic themes and quests and ideals that pervade the life of even the worst scoundrel — these all give evidence of the greater context in which you have your being.”

Would You like to comment on it?

We have in a previous blog ** expressed our compassion about an unbelieving human being while he is kept alive by the spiritual world.
Seth's words are beautiful and clear and do not need further explanation. Such a unbelieving human being man is dramatically  funny in our eyes. Yet there is one very important aspect that I would like to add.
Thus unbelieving is mainly originated in the Western world and has a grand purpose. Because of this science is given a strong impetus to develop freely and independently from religions. Enlightenment and secularism are from Our perspective two very cherished human achievements.
Seth and Jane Roberts are blessed.

My blessings to you all

*The serie of Seth-books by Jane Roberts, The individual and the nature of mass events, p.316s
  Seth is a spiritual being who passes a serie of books with Jane Roberts as a messenger.
** See blog 14-11-2011

Nr. 348